Challenges And Prospects For The Establishment Of A Multilateral Investment Court: Quo Vadis Enforcement?
in: Ch. Klausegger, P. Klein et al. (Eds), Austrian Yearbook on International Arbitration 2018, Vienna 2018, pp. 157 - 178
The Composition of a Multilateral Investment Court and of an Appeal Mechanism for Investment Awards
CIDS Supplemental Report, Geneva 2017, 127 pagesDownload (pdf, 1063.3k)
Preliminary Objections to Dismiss Claims that are Manifestly without Legal Merit under Rule 41(5) of the ICSID Arbitration Rules
in: C. Baltag (Ed.), ICSID Convention after 50 Years - Unsettled Issues, Alphen aan den Rijn 2017, pp. 249-271Download (pdf, 169.2k)
Can the Mauritius Convention serve as a model for the reform of investor-State arbitration in connection with the introduction of a permanent investment tribunal or an appeal mechanism? Analysis and roadmap
CIDS Research Paper, Geneva 2016, 115 pagesDownload (pdf, 872.5k)
Towards a Greater Role for State-to-State Arbitration in the Architecture of Investment Treaties?
in: S. Lalani/R. Polanco Lazo (Eds), The Role of the State in Investor-State Arbitration, Leiden 2015, pp. 249-273
“Mr. Franck Charles Arif v. Republic of Moldova, ICSID Case No. ARB/11/23, Award, 8 April 2013”, Case comment
Journal of World Investment & Trade 2014, pp. 1011-1019
Legitimate Expectations in Investment Treaty Law: Understanding the Roots and the Limits of a Controversial Concept
ICSID Review—Foreign Investment Law Journal 2013, pp. 88–122Download (pdf, 516.3k)
From mutual supportiveness to mutual enforcement? The contribution of US Preferential Trade and Investment Agreements to the effectiveness of environmental norms
in: R. Hofmann, C. Tams and S. Schill (Eds), Preferential Trade and Investment Agreements: From Recalibration to Reintegration, Baden-Baden 2013, pp. 167-185
Mapping Environmental Concerns in International Investment Agreements: How Far Have We Gone?
in: T. Treves, F. Seatzu and S. Trevisanut (Eds), Foreign Investment and Common Concerns: An International Law Perspective, London 2013, pp. 193-212
La rinuncia preventiva all’impugnabilità del lodo arbitrale è compatibile con la Convenzione europea dei diritti dell’uomo? [Advance waiver to the challenge of an award: Is it compatible with the ECHR?]
(Case report, Swiss Federal Tribunal, 4 January 2012), Rivista dell’Arbitrato 2013, pp. 171-185Download (pdf, 218.9k)